1T

1X Technologies

Application

Norwegian-American robotics company building humanoid robots for labor.

Total funding$136.5M

Valuation$820M

Employees—

Founded2014

HeadquartersSan Francisco, USA

StatusPrivate

Product

Selected offerings — the AI products recorded here, not the vendor's full catalogue.

• NEO Robot Sold on its own

  Humanoid home robot that performs household tasks, with a human teleoperator available when its autonomy is insufficient.

Similar products 14

No sourced competitor yet: no filing, vendor document or measured-market report read so far names a rival for this company, so none is asserted. The companies below are the closest by what their products do.

How this list is ranked ↗

AApptronikPrivate · $5.3BNEO and Apollo do comparable work on robot control; larger scale (private).1 of 1 capabilityShared product typeLarger scaleCompareBDBoston DynamicsAcquiredNEO and Spot / Atlas do comparable work on robot control; Boston Dynamics is acquired, with no independent scale.1 of 1 capabilityShared product typeCompareSASanctuary AIPrivateNEO and Phoenix do comparable work on robot control; Sanctuary AI's scale not recorded.1 of 1 capabilityShared product typeCompareFAFigure AIPrivate · $39BNEO and Figure 03 do comparable work on robot control; larger scale (private).1 of 1 capabilityShared product typeLarger scaleCompareARAgility RoboticsPrivate · $2.5BNEO and Digit do comparable work on robot control; larger scale (private).1 of 1 capabilityShared product typeLarger scaleCompareSSymboticPublic · $24.6BNEO and SymBot do comparable work on robot control; larger scale (public).1 of 1 capabilityShared product typeLarger scaleCompareAAvridePrivateNEO and Avride Delivery Robot do comparable work on robot control; Avride's scale not recorded.1 of 1 capabilityShared product typeCompareSASkild AIPrivate · $14BNEO and Skild Brain do comparable work on robot control; larger scale (private); ships platform rather than the same layer.1 of 1 capabilityDifferent layerLarger scaleCompareHHelsingPrivate · $18BNEO and HX-2 do comparable work on robot control; larger scale (private).1 of 1 capabilityShared product typeLarger scaleCompareRRunwayPrivate · $5.3BNEO and Runway Robotics do comparable work on robot control; larger scale (private).1 of 1 capabilityShared product typeLarger scaleCompareKMKakao MobilityPrivateNEO and BRING do comparable work on robot control; Kakao Mobility's scale not recorded; ships application and platform rather than the same layer.1 of 1 capabilityDifferent layerCompareAIAnduril IndustriesPrivate · $61BNEO and Ghost do comparable work on robot control; larger scale (private).1 of 1 capabilityShared product typeLarger scaleComparePIPhysical IntelligencePrivate · $11.2BNEO and π0 do comparable work on robot control; larger scale (private); ships developer tool rather than the same layer.1 of 1 capabilityDifferent layerLarger scaleCompareSSenseTimePublic · $7.7BNEO and SenseRobot do comparable work on robot control; larger scale (public).1 of 1 capabilityShared product typeLarger scaleCompare

Closest alternatives are pairs a vendor page itself compares. Similar products are matched from what each product does; nothing in that group is asserted as a rivalry.

Sources

Total funding

Third-party database · 11 Sep 2026

Sacra's own cumulative tally: $23.5M Series A2 (Mar 2023, OpenAI Startup Fund) + $100M Series B (Jan 2024, EQT Ventures) ≈ $136.5M. Corrects the previously recorded $100M, which was only the Series B round.

Valuation

News reporting · 13 Jan 2024

Humanoid Robot Developer 1X Targets $1 Billion in New Funding, The Information, 2025-09-22. post-money valuation of the round dated 2024-01-13. Read via stockanalysis.com's citation for this figure on 2026-08-27.

Employees

Checked — none published

Checked 2026-08-27 and no citable figure found. Four sweeps were run and all came back empty for this company: (1) its own /about, /about-us, /company, /careers, /jobs and /team pages, pattern-matched for a self-published headcount; (2) stockanalysis.com's private-company page, which footnotes each figure to its source; (3) its Forbes company profile, which states a headcount and the month it is as of; (4) a targeted web search. Everything the search returned was a LinkedIn-scraping aggregator, and those disagree with each other by wide margins and cite nothing, so they are not used here. The field is null rather than carrying the round guess it held before.

Founded

Wikipedia · 27 Aug 2026

Wikipedia infobox "founded" field, read 2026-08-27.

Open 1X Technologies in the directory

Something wrong here? Send a correction — quote this company id: 1x-technologies.