AMD: compare with another company

136 comparisons, best match first. Pick one to see it side by side.

• AMD vs NVIDIAShips data-centre training and inference accelerators to the same buyers; a direct head-to-head on rack-scale AI systems, named as such in AMD's own 10-K.
• AMD vs SambaNovaSacra names AMD's chip line as a major-player rival in the same AI accelerator hardware market SambaNova competes in.
• AMD vs Groq
• AMD vs Marvell Technology
• AMD vs IntelBoth ship data-centre AI accelerators — Instinct against Gaudi — in a rivalry AMD's own 10-K states across CPUs, GPUs and DPUs; the accelerator fight is one front of a broader AMD–Intel contest.
• AMD vs BroadcomAMD's FY2025 10-K names Broadcom among the ASSP vendors it competes against on data-centre networking/AI-NIC silicon.
• AMD vs ModularSDxCentral reports Modular pitching its unified stack (MAX and Mojo) against vendor-specific runtimes like CUDA and ROCm; Mojo is the GPU programming language of that stack, so ROCm is the rival it replaces.
• AMD vs HuaweiAMD Instinct and Atlas do comparable work on accelerator silicon and model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute; Huawei's scale not comparable: only a revenue estimate, no market cap or valuation.
• AMD vs Cerebras SystemsAMD and Cerebras announced a technical partnership pairing AMD Helios racks with the Cerebras Wafer-Scale Engine for inference.
• AMD vs QualcommAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and Qualcomm AI Inference Suite both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to run an open-weight model on your own infrastructure and serve a model in production; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs Arista NetworksAMD Pensando AI NICs and 7060X5 Series do comparable work on AI compute hardware and interconnect; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs GraphcoreAMD Instinct and IPU (Intelligence Processing Unit) do comparable work on accelerator silicon and model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute; Graphcore's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs Super Micro ComputerAMD Developer Cloud and SuperCloud Developer Console (SDX) both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to serve a model in production and train or fine-tune a model; Super Micro Computer's scale not comparable: only a revenue estimate, no market cap or valuation.
• AMD vs Arm HoldingsAMD Ryzen AI Halo and Arm C2 CPU cluster both list AI compute hardware; both also serve buyers who need to run AI on a device or at the edge; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs Hewlett Packard EnterpriseAMD Kria SOMs and HPE ProLiant Compute DL380a Gen12 both list AI compute hardware; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs CiscoAMD Helios Rackscale Solution and Cisco AI PODs for Collaboration both list server systems; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute; same layer and the same scale band (large-cap).
• AMD vs Lamb LabsAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 and Lamb Labs MPU both list accelerator silicon; Lamb Labs's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs SK HynixAMD Kria SOMs and DDR5 RDIMM and MRDIMM both serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute; same layer and the same scale band (large-cap).
• AMD vs CrusoeAMD Developer Cloud and Crusoe Cloud do comparable work on GPU cloud and model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute, serve a model in production and train or fine-tune a model; smaller scale (private).
• AMD vs 4Paradigm4Paradigm SageOne Workstation and AMD Ryzen AI Halo both list AI compute hardware; both also serve buyers who need to run AI on a device or at the edge; larger scale (public).
• AMD vs Vast.aiAMD Developer Cloud and Vast.ai GPU Cloud do comparable work on GPU cloud and model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute, serve a model in production and train or fine-tune a model; Vast.ai's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs TenstorrentAMD Kria SOMs and Wormhole both list AI compute hardware; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute; smaller scale (private).
• AMD vs Piris LabsAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and Piris Labs AI Endpoint both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; Piris Labs's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs Nebius GroupAMD Developer Cloud and Nebius AI Cloud do comparable work on GPU cloud and model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute, serve a model in production and train or fine-tune a model; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs MobileyeAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 and EyeQ System-on-Chip both list accelerator silicon; both also serve buyers who need to run AI on a device or at the edge; Mobileye's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs Nodus ComputeAMD Developer Cloud and Nodus do comparable work on GPU cloud and model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute, serve a model in production and train or fine-tune a model; Nodus Compute's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs RanovusAMD Pensando AI NICs and Odin both list interconnect; Ranovus's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs Applied MaterialsAMD Instinct and SEMVision H20 both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs OllamaOllama and AMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to run an open-weight model on your own infrastructure and serve a model in production; Ollama's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs Huawei CloudAMD Ryzen AI Software and Huawei HiLens both serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; Huawei Cloud's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs AlibabaAlibaba Cloud Elastic GPU Service and AMD Developer Cloud do comparable work on GPU cloud and model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute, serve a model in production and train or fine-tune a model; larger scale (public).
• AMD vs Credo Technology GroupAMD Pensando AI NICs and ZeroFlap / OmniConnect both list interconnect; Credo Technology Group's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs Astera LabsAstera Labs' Aries 7 release carries AMD's statement that it works with Astera Labs as an ecosystem partner.
• AMD vs AmazonAWS Trainium and AMD Instinct do comparable work on accelerator silicon and model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs Kakao EnterpriseAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and Kubeflow both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; Kakao Enterprise's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs Axelera AIAMD Ryzen AI Halo and Axelera Edge 130p both list AI compute hardware; both also serve buyers who need to run AI on a device or at the edge; Axelera AI's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs Alphabet (Google)AI Hypercomputer and AMD Developer Cloud both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute, serve a model in production and train or fine-tune a model; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs Horizon RoboticsAMD Kria SOMs and Journey 6 Series both list AI compute hardware; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs CoreWeaveAMD Developer Cloud and CoreWeave AI Cloud do comparable work on GPU cloud and model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute, serve a model in production and train or fine-tune a model; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs OpenRelayAMD Developer Cloud and OpenRelay both list GPU cloud; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute and serve a model in production; OpenRelay's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs LM StudioAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and LM Link both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to run an open-weight model on your own infrastructure and serve a model in production; LM Studio's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs PacificAMD Kria SOMs and Pacific Pod both list AI compute hardware; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute; Pacific's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs SenseTimeAMD Developer Cloud and SenseCore do comparable work on GPU cloud and model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute, serve a model in production and train or fine-tune a model; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs DatabricksAMD Developer Cloud and AI Runtime do comparable work on GPU cloud and model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute and train or fine-tune a model; smaller scale (private).
• AMD vs FalAMD Developer Cloud and fal Compute do comparable work on GPU cloud and model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute and train or fine-tune a model; Fal's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs Schneider ElectricAMD Kria SOMs and NetShelter Power Rack 800VDC both list AI compute hardware; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs StoaAMD Kria SOMs and Stoa both list AI compute hardware; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute; Stoa's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs BaiduAMD Developer Cloud and Baidu Baige AI Computing Platform do comparable work on GPU cloud and model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute, serve a model in production and train or fine-tune a model; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs Cactus ComputeAMD Ryzen AI Software and Cactus both serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; Cactus Compute's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs Core42AMD Kria SOMs and Core42 Sovereign AI Cloud both list AI compute hardware; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute; Core42's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs Together AIAMD Ryzen AI Software and Together Batch Inference both serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; smaller scale (private).
• AMD vs Hailo TechnologiesAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 and Hailo AI accelerators both list accelerator silicon; both also serve buyers who need to run AI on a device or at the edge; Hailo Technologies is acquired, with no independent scale.
• AMD vs MicrosoftAMD Ryzen AI Halo and Surface RTX Spark Dev Box both list AI compute hardware; both also serve buyers who need to run AI on a device or at the edge; larger scale (public).
• AMD vs LambdaAMD Developer Cloud and Lambda Cloud do comparable work on GPU cloud and model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute, serve a model in production and train or fine-tune a model; Lambda's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs ReplicateAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and Replicate both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; Replicate's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs BasetenAMD Ryzen AI Software and Baseten Inference Runtime both serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; smaller scale (private).
• AMD vs UnslothAMD ROCm and Unsloth both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to run an open-weight model on your own infrastructure, serve a model in production and train or fine-tune a model; Unsloth's scale not recorded; ships developer tool rather than the same layer.
• AMD vs LightmatterAMD Pensando AI NICs and Passage both list interconnect; smaller scale (private).
• AMD vs SiemensAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and Industrial AI Suite both serve buyers who need to run an open-weight model on your own infrastructure and serve a model in production; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs Ayar LabsAMD Pensando AI NICs and SuperNova both list interconnect; smaller scale (private).
• AMD vs Dell Technologies
• AMD vs OneTriangleAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and OneTriangle Inference both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; OneTriangle's scale not recorded; ships model API rather than the same layer.
• AMD vs TouchmarkAMD Developer Cloud and Touchmark both list GPU cloud; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute; Touchmark's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs Weights & BiasesAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and Serverless Inference both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; Weights & Biases is acquired, with no independent scale.
• AMD vs JFrogAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and JFrog AI Catalog both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; JFrog's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs TencentAMD Developer Cloud and Tencent Cloud HAI both list GPU cloud; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute and serve a model in production; same layer and the same scale band (large-cap).
• AMD vs IsoquantAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and Isoquant both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; Isoquant's scale not recorded; ships model API rather than the same layer.
• AMD vs RunAnywhereAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and Wally both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; RunAnywhere's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs RunPodAMD Developer Cloud and Pods do comparable work on GPU cloud and model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute, serve a model in production and train or fine-tune a model; smaller scale (private).
• AMD vs Volcano EngineAMD Ryzen AI Software and Machine Learning Platform (机器学习平台) both serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; Volcano Engine's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs RiftenAMD ROCm and Riften both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; Riften's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs BelvedirAMD ROCm and Belvedir both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; Belvedir's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs OrchestraAMD ROCm and Orchestra both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; Orchestra's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs CivitaiCivitai and AMD Ryzen AI Software both serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; Civitai's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs DecartAMD ROCm and Decart Optimization Stack do comparable work on GPU programming and model training; both also serve buyers who need to program GPU accelerators, run an open-weight model on your own infrastructure, serve a model in production and 1 more; smaller scale (private).
• AMD vs VMwareAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and VMware Cloud Foundation Private AI Services both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; VMware is acquired, with no independent scale.
• AMD vs Hugging FaceAMD Ryzen AI Software and Inference Endpoints both serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; smaller scale (private).
• AMD vs LabelboxHorizon and AMD ROCm both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; Labelbox's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs Humain
• AMD vs KuaishouAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and Vanchin both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs IBMIBM's press release announces a collaboration with AMD to combine AI accelerators, quantum computers and high-performance computing.
• AMD vs AshrAMD ROCm and Ashr both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; Ashr's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs GitLabAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and GitLab Duo Agent Platform Self-Hosted both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to run an open-weight model on your own infrastructure and serve a model in production; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs Comet MLComet Experiment Tracking and AMD Developer Cloud both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; Comet ML's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs ModalAMD Developer Cloud and Modal both list GPU cloud; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute and serve a model in production; smaller scale (private).
• AMD vs Thinking Machines LabAMD Developer Cloud and Tinker both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to serve a model in production and train or fine-tune a model; smaller scale (private); ships API service rather than the same layer.
• AMD vs Insilico MedicineChemistry42 and AMD ROCm both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; larger scale (public).
• AMD vs KimptonAMD ROCm and Kimpton Koliseum both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; Kimpton's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs Mistral AIAMD Developer Cloud and Mistral Compute do comparable work on GPU cloud and model training; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute and train or fine-tune a model; smaller scale (private).
• AMD vs ZEISSAMD ROCm and ZEISS arivis Cloud both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; ZEISS's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs Black Forest LabsOpen Weights Licensing and AMD Developer Cloud both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; larger scale (public).
• AMD vs Oracle
• AMD vs YandexAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and Yandex DataSphere both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs Fireworks AI
• AMD vs ConiferAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and Conifer both list model hosting; Conifer's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs TolokaAMD ROCm and Toloka Arena both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; Toloka's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs AdobeAMD Ryzen AI Software and Adobe Firefly Services both serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs CohereAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and Model Vault both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; smaller scale (private).
• AMD vs HeliconeAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and Helicone AI Gateway both list model hosting; Helicone is acquired, with no independent scale.
• AMD vs Snorkel AISnorkel Flow and AMD ROCm both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; larger scale (public).
• AMD vs AppenAMD ROCm and AI Data Platform both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; Appen's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs VercelAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and Vercel AI Gateway both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; smaller scale (private).
• AMD vs ORO AIAMD ROCm and ORO both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; ORO AI's scale not recorded; ships data service rather than the same layer.
• AMD vs TokenlessAMD ROCm and Tokenless EnvCheck both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; Tokenless's scale not recorded; ships developer tool rather than the same layer.
• AMD vs NAVER CloudOverlaps on AI cloud infrastructure, but as a named AMD partner: NAVER Cloud is deploying AMD EPYC and Instinct hardware and the two are jointly optimizing NAVER's AI stack on AMD ROCm, not competing silicon or software.
• AMD vs ElasticAMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack and Elastic Inference Service both list model hosting; both also serve buyers who need to serve a model in production; smaller scale (public).
• AMD vs TuringRL environments and AMD ROCm both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; larger scale (public); ships application, hardware and 2 more rather than the same layer.
• AMD vs Samsung ElectronicsSamsung and AMD signed an agreement to expand their collaboration on AI memory and computing.
• AMD vs CueBenchAMD ROCm and CueBench environments both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; CueBench's scale not recorded; ships data service rather than the same layer.
• AMD vs EdotEnvAMD ROCm and EdotEnv environments both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; EdotEnv's scale not recorded; ships data service rather than the same layer.
• AMD vs Olam LabsAMD ROCm and Olam Labs Evaluations both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; Olam Labs's scale not recorded; ships data service rather than the same layer.
• AMD vs Ooak DataAMD ROCm and Ooak Data RL Environments both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; Ooak Data's scale not recorded; ships data service rather than the same layer.
• AMD vs TwolabsAMD ROCm and Twolabs Environments and Datasets both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; Twolabs's scale not recorded; ships data service rather than the same layer.
• AMD vs LovableLovable Cloud and AMD Enterprise AI Reference Stack both list model hosting; larger scale (public).
• AMD vs Agnost AIAgnost AI and AMD ROCm both list model training; Agnost AI's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs EleutherAIAMD ROCm and GPT-NeoX both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; EleutherAI is a nonprofit, with no independent scale; ships developer tool rather than the same layer.
• AMD vs DatoricAMD ROCm and Datoric datasets both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; Datoric's scale not recorded; ships data service rather than the same layer.
• AMD vs EnactAMD ROCm and Enact both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; Enact's scale not recorded; ships data service rather than the same layer.
• AMD vs Space42GIQ and AMD ROCm both list model training; larger scale (public).
• AMD vs SK TelecomAMD Developer Cloud and SKT GPUaaS both list GPU cloud; both also serve buyers who need to buy data-centre AI compute, serve a model in production and train or fine-tune a model; SK Telecom's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs HexagonAMD Developer Cloud and VGTRAINER both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; Hexagon's scale not recorded.
• AMD vs StableBrowseAMD ROCm and StableBrowse Physical AI Data both list model training; both also serve buyers who need to train or fine-tune a model; StableBrowse's scale not recorded; ships data service rather than the same layer.
• AMD vs SAS
• AMD vs Runway
• AMD vs Meta Platforms
• AMD vs Aleph Alpha
• AMD vs Anaconda
• AMD vs LG Corp
• AMD vs Stability AI
• AMD vs 01.AI
• AMD vs Dataiku
• AMD vs Liquid AI
• AMD vs Neo4j
• AMD vs Not Diamond
• AMD vs OpenAI
• AMD vs Upstage